Jul 10 2008

Choosing a Fuel Economy Transmission

Published by Benjamin Jones at 8:03 pm under Uncategorized

This article will be technically geared towards the CRX and other Civic models from 1988-2000. However, the general implications of these changes are applicable to almost any make and model of car or truck. I will detail my own changes as well as cite a few cases of fellow members from my primary forum: ecomodder.com as well as give resources that will allow you to make your own decision on the matter. While I will be primarily discussing the transmission that will give you the best mileage, there are many forms your gearing can take to meet all of your goals.

First things first, what I did with my CRX. I began with an automatic and could barely squeeze 40 MPG out of it. Needless to say I was very frustrated with its performance. Not only did I hate the gas mileage, I hated the way it drove. So, I embarked on the mission to begin my auto to manual swap. That’s a whole other ordeal, which I will discuss in a dedicated article, but suffice it to say that when I weighed my options I chose the most fuel efficient transmission I could. I wanted the most bang for my buck, and I got it; I picked the transmission up for free from a www.honda-tech.com member. In the end I’ve averaged ~51 MPG over my last two tanks with the stick shift, and I’ve loved every minute of it.

On the technical side of things there are 5 basics transmissions found in 88-91 Honda Civics: the auto, the DX/LX, the Si, the HF, and the STD.

  • The automatic is just that, automatic. It gets terrible mileage and doesn’t have much potential. If this is what you have a swap is highly suggested for greater gas mileage. Even with the most fuel economy-minded transmission the car will seem to have more power. If you can’t drive stick, learn; Hondas are very easy cars for new stick drivers.
  • The DX/LX manual transmission is basically the middle of the road; it is basically the same as the Si transmission with a lower final drive ratio.
  • The Si transmission has the shortest gearing of an US civic transmission from this era. As far as fuel economy is concerned this transmission should be avoided, it will give you ~3,000 RPM at 65 MPH.

  • I have the HF transmission in my car. It was built for fuel economy and it certainly delivers. The gearing is longer than any other car you’re ever likely to drive and delivers a healthy 1700 RPM at 55 MPH on the highway. Without this transmission I doubt I could so easily hit 50 MPG.
  • The STD was the super economy Civic, and as such received a 4 speed manual transmission. This thing is just a step above an automatic and should be eliminated at all costs!

To compare on the technical side of things, here are the gear ratios from the four most used options you will have:

Civic STD
CRX HF
Civic/CRX DX/LX
Civic/CRX Si
Clutch Type
Cable
Cable
Cable
Cable
Trans. Code
L3
L3
L3
L3
First
3.250
3.250
3.250
3.250
Second
1.650
1.650
1.894
1.894
Third
1.033
1.033
1.259
1.259
Fourth
0.823
0.823
0.937
0.937
Fifth
-
.694
0.771
0.771
Reverse
3.153
3.153
3.153
3.153
Final Drive
3.888
2.95/3.25 (CA)
3.888
4.250

For those of us with newer Civics refer to the following tables (gears from these two tables are mixable but not final drives or complete transmissions):

92-95 Civic DX/LX/S
92-95 Civic EX/Si
92-95 Civic CX/VX
96-00 Civic LX/DX
96-00 Civic CX/HX
96-00 Civic EX
Clutch Type
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Trans. Code
S20
S20
S20
First
3.250
3.250
3.250
3.250
3.250
3.250
Second
1.761
1.900
1.761
1.782
1.782
1.909
Third
1.172
1.250
1.066
1.172
1.172
1.250
Fourth
0.909
0.909
0.853
0.909
0.909
0.909
Fifth
0.702
0.702/0.750 (HB)
0.702
0.702
0.702
.702
Reverse
3.153
3.153
3.153
3.153
3.153
3.153
Final Drive
4.058
4.250
3.250
3.722
3.722
4.250/4.058 (HB)

For those of us with even newer Civics use this table:

01-05 Civic DX/LX
01-05 Civic HX
01-05 Civic EX
Clutch Type
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Hydraulic
Trans. Code
First
3.462
3.461
3.143
Second
1.870
1.750
1.870
Third
1.241
1.166
1.241
Fourth
0.970
0.857
0.970
Fifth
0.711
0.710
0.757
Reverse
3.231
3.230
3.231
Final Drive
4.111
3.842
4.412

With these go to this gear ratio calculator and take a look at cruising RPM and shift points that various transmissions will afford you.

There’s not much more I can do to arm you with information, so at this point I will give you some statistics from my own swap and some other information I’ve dug up over the ages. Here is what my gearing looks like across the board (you can see how high it is, my transmission top speed is something like 220 MPH): Now, you must be thinking that with such a transmission acceleration would be brutal, but this is not the case either! My shift points are as follows:

  • 1 –> 2; 1500 RPM, 8 MPH
  • 2 –> 3; 1500 RPM, 20 MPH
  • 3 –> 4; 1250 RPM, 25 MPH
  • 4 –> 5; 1250 RPM, 30 MPH


That leaves me in 5th gear accelerating from 30 MPH. Sure it’s slow, but the fuel economy is amazing, so I don’t mind. My lifetime automatic mileage was 35.8 MPG, and so far I have managed 51.2 MPG with the 5 speed CRX HF transmission; quite the difference, if I don’t say so myself (40%, beat that, acetone)! You can check out my online gaslog here at www.ecomodder.com.

Another forum member, named Darin (MetroMPG) swapped to a transmission with longer gearing and saw what he approximates as a 5-6% gain. This may not seem like much, but when you’re pumping out 75 MPG tanks and 117 MPG segments, it’s nothing to scoff at. You can check out his findings and process in his swap thread here.

I also helped another member upgrade from his 4 speed STD transmission to a 5 speed CRX HF transmission. Not only was the swap a lot of fun, but look at his gaslog. His driving isn’t exactly consistent and he doesn’t drive for great mileage, but the improvement is there. He’s gone from 38.8 MPG before the swap to 43.9 MPG after, an improvement of 13.2%. You can also see a correlation between engine off coasting and gas mileage, but that’s something for another article.

There will be more success stories to come! If you have any questions about parts, prices, or procedure feel free to email me and I’ll give you all the advice you need.

PS: If you’re wondering how to determine which transmission is which for EF Civics/CRXs, check out this picture:

11 Responses to “Choosing a Fuel Economy Transmission”

  1. Mitchell Hayeson 21 Jul 2008 at 7:37 am

    I am new to Hondas and find these posts to be very helpful. One thing that I would like to know is which engine you are using with the HF transmission, the 8 valve or the 16 valve. I have an 89 crx 16 valve DX with a 5 speed that averages 39.6 mpg combined city/hwy. I would like to try the HF trans swap but am concerned that that going from a 3.88 to a 2.95 final drive ratio would cause a huge loss of manifold vacuum with the 16 valver which would prevent any real fuel economy gain. I could try going with a tire with a little more rollout to keep the revs down. Would I be better off doing that or both to improve the fuel economy? What are your thoughts? Thanks.

  2. Benjamin Joneson 22 Jul 2008 at 12:42 pm

    I’m running the Civic VX, d15z1 right now, actually. You’d be fine with the HF tranny and shouldn’t need to worry about manifold vacuum. Both would be ideal, but the HF tranny is definitely worth the effort, I think.

    Thanks for commenting.

  3. Paul Andersonon 28 Jul 2008 at 10:23 am

    Hi Benjamin,

    I am wanting to purchase a CRX. I have always wanted one, and know the HF model with the 1.5L to be the ultimate gas mileage machine. I’m thinking about an ‘89-’91 model, but I find tons of Si’s, but almost no HF’s. Would you be willing to speculate on the mileage of an 1.6L SI with the HF Trans, and will this swap work? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Your Friend,

    Paul
    Boca Raton, FL

  4. Benjamin Joneson 28 Jul 2008 at 10:30 am

    Hey Paul -

    I think you’d do well in the 40s with the si engine and hf transmission, though if you go all out and do a civic vx swap with the hf gearing you can get in the 60s (like me).

  5. Paul Andersonon 28 Jul 2008 at 11:55 am

    I took a look at some of the Civic VX photos. The look of the CRX is what I really want. If the HF trans will work in your car, could the engine not work in the CRX? If so, the SI being I think 600-800 pounds lighter, could I pull the kind of numbers you’re getting? Or better? By the way, what year is your VX and which engine does it have?

    Thanks Again,

    PA

  6. Benjamin Joneson 30 Jul 2008 at 11:42 am

    I actually don’t have a VX, but the CRX I talk about here has gotten that engine swap. The VX and crx si weigh about the same amount, anyway, though the CRX has better aero. You could definitely duplicate my numbers. Look for my swap post in a day or so (kind of involved writeup).

    Ben

  7. timon 24 Nov 2008 at 9:27 am

    Looking to buy a vx and put in a tranny like you did.. How is city driving with that transmission? How much is the engine struggling at those shift points? Can you romp on it in an emergency?

    I just dont want to focus on high gas mileage and end up with a car with zero power.

  8. Mitch Hayeson 24 Nov 2008 at 11:28 am

    I am still wondering if the HF trans will not help my in town mileage with the D15b2 16 valve in my 89 CRX. I understand that the VTEC d15z1 is definitely aimed at low speed power, but I don’t have this engine (at least not yet). Dropping the final drive from 3.88 to 2.95 will likely help mileage on the hwy, but in town, I wonder about it due to the lack of torque multiplication. This reminds me of the 1970s with American V8 cars. After the 1973 oil crunch, Detroit started putting crazy axle ratios in their cars. I have seen 2.56 and 2.41 rear gears. We found out that going from a 2.73 to a 3.73 did not tend to change in-town mileage much. Hwy mileage is different because it is steady state driving. Have you tried the HF specifically with the stock DX dual point non-VTEC engine, and, if so, what were your results? Thanks for doing this site. It is really helpful.

  9. Benjamin Joneson 24 Nov 2008 at 11:50 am

    Tim -

    It’s fine for me. I’ve never been in a situation where I needed to accelerate away from danger, in any car, so I can’t comment on that.

    Mitch -

    I’ve not personally tried, but you can ask around ecomodder.com since I’m sure someone has.

  10. La honda a moteur a essence la plus on 14 Mar 2009 at 1:40 am

    [...] que les rapports de transmission de la tranny de VX sont les plus courts SAUF ceux de la CRX HF. crxMPG - Gas mileage never looked so good Choosing a Fuel Economy Transmission [...]

  11. La honda a moteur a essence la plus on 15 Mar 2009 at 7:24 am

    [...] que les rapports de transmission de la tranny de VX sont les plus courts SAUF ceux de la CRX HF. crxMPG - Gas mileage never looked so good Choosing a Fuel Economy Transmission [...]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply